Transmitting information to us by e-mail unilaterally does not establish an attorney-client relationship or impose an obligation on either the law firm or even the receiving lawyer to keep the transmitted information confidential. By clicking "OK", you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us unless we already represent you or unless we have agreed to receive limited confidential material/information from you as a prospective client. Thus, if you are not a client or someone we have agreed to consider as a prospective client, information you submit to us by e-mail may be disclosed to others or used against you. If you would like to discuss becoming a client, please contact one of our attorneys to arrange for a meeting or telephone conference. If you wish to disclose confidential information to a lawyer in the firm before an attorney-client relationship is established, the protections that the law firm will provide to such information from a prospective client should be discussed before such information is submitted. Thank you for your interest in Goodwin Procter.

Inconsistent Judgments From Federal Courts and PTO in Hatch-Waxman Litigation: Can A Generic Manufacturer That Was Unable to Invalidate a Patent in District Court Try Again in a Post-Grant Proceeding, and Will a Different Outcome Absolve the

main

Inconsistent Judgments From Federal Courts and PTO in Hatch Waxman Litigation

Inconsistent Judgments From Federal Courts and PTO in Hatch-Waxman Litigation: Can A Generic Manufacturer That Was Unable to Invalidate a Patent in District Court Try Again in a Post-Grant Proceeding, and Will a Different Outcome Absolve the | Insights & Resources | Goodwin